Sermon arguing the sufficiency of Scripture to define women’s roles in church and marriage, affirming male headship from the creation order (Genesis) and Paul’s teaching; opposing women’s ordination.

Critique of secular psychology’s fragmentation and failures, urging Christian counselors to rely on Scripture and Christ as the authoritative standard for change.

Advocates a Christian philosophy of education grounded in Scripture’s sufficiency, warning that secular alternatives are Satanic counterfeits that fuel cultural decline.

Overview of theonomic ethics: God’s Word and moral law govern all areas of life and nations; many Old Testament laws are viewed as universally binding within covenant theology.

A Reformed critique of theonomy arguing Scripture’s sufficiency is discerned from Scripture and God’s purposes. Affirms Spirit‑illumination and the proper role of God’s law while rejecting theonomy’s civil program.

History of the creation doctrine in American Presbyterianism, showing how geology and Darwin challenged six-day readings and how Princeton theologians and others responded.

A Reformed defense of the biblical doctrine of creation: Genesis 1's literal days, the creator–creature distinction, and creation as revelation underpinning knowledge, science, and apologetics.

Scholarly analysis of Genesis 1–2 focusing on genre, Hebrew discourse grammar, pericope boundaries, chiasmus, and how literal interpretation informs creation doctrine and exegesis.

Argues for young-earth creationism: the Genesis account is read literally; scientific evidence and geochronometers are presented to challenge old‑earth geology and evolution.

Argues Westminster divines endorsed six 24‑hour creation days. The speaker traces his shift to the classical view and criticizes modern evolutionary paradigms on historical and exegetical grounds.

Reflection on Genesis 1:31: God's six-day creation was 'very good'—a progressive ordering of space, time, and life—marred by sin yet still retaining essential goodness.

Argues the framework hypothesis: Genesis 1’s seven-day scheme is topical, not chronological. Upholds Genesis' historicity and insists interpretation rest on exegesis, not scientific authority.

Defense of a literal 24-hour reading of Genesis 1 based on Hebrew grammar and narrative structure. Argues ruach elohim = Spirit, explains tohu vabohu, and rejects Babylonian parallels.

Argues animal death entered creation only after Adam’s fall. Defends a vegetarian pre-fall world from Genesis and Romans, opposing views that animals died before sin.

Argues animal death entered creation only after Adam’s fall. Defends a vegetarian pre-fall world from Genesis and Romans, opposing views that animals died before sin.

Reflection on Genesis and modern science—creation, evolution, the Big Bang, and Usherian chronology. Urges hermeneutical caution regarding the six days and genealogies.

Defends a sequential reading of Genesis 1–2 against framework/non-literal interpretations. Argues Hebrew grammar (Vav consecutive) and Moses’ narrative structure support chronological sequence.

Intro to James Woodrow, Perkins Professor at Columbia Seminary—his life, advocacy to harmonize science and Scripture, and the origins of the Woodrow evolution controversy.

Summary of the 1886 Southern General Assembly’s Woodrow controversy: ecclesiastical turmoil over Westminster subscription, Genesis interpretation, and its effects on church polity.

Lecture surveying Old School vs New School Presbyterianism in America, focusing on subscription to the Westminster standards, the 1729 Adopting Act, and revival-era disputes.